Jriver media center skin9/20/2023 ![]() While some people may applaud the type of business model followed by foobar2000, in reality the customers of that type of business tend to treat the businesses with contempt. Foobar2000's software feels positively disjointed compared to JRMC. However, since so few people actually donate money to support foobar2000, its support forums are a mere shadow of JRMC's. Quote Foobar2000 is perfectly good if you're counting your nickles. As for sound, I don't expect any difference, as both Pono and Foobar are set up to output the same way to my DAC. I only have FLAC, WMA Lossless and MP3 files in my library, so I can't say if it works perfectly with every format. I haven't explored all of its capabilities (ripping/converting etc.), but as a media player, it is pretty good. The standard skin is very black and some of the alternatives are more legible. Lots of options for personalisation and it comes with a few skins preloaded too. It is slower to read my library folders than Foobar, but then isn't pretty much anything? ![]() I used to do it with WMP, but it doesn't do FLAC and has been playing up for a while now anyway. ![]() I find myself selecting different music when I'm browsing by image. I installed it a few weeks ago, partly just to play with it, but also because I like a second media player with a more graphic interface than Foobar. Money-saving tip - the Pono desktop software is, at heart, JRiver, only with a few differences like integration with the Pono Store. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |